🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.