🔗 Share this article

In the opening pages of the publication Authentic, speaker the author raises a critical point: commonplace advice to “bring your true self” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not harmless encouragements for individuality – they can be pitfalls. This initial publication – a combination of memoir, studies, cultural commentary and interviews – seeks to unmask how businesses appropriate personal identity, transferring the weight of corporate reform on to employees who are frequently at risk.

Career Path and Wider Environment

The impetus for the book originates in part in Burey’s own career trajectory: various roles across business retail, emerging businesses and in global development, viewed through her experience as a Black disabled woman. The dual posture that the author encounters – a tension between standing up for oneself and looking for safety – is the core of her work.

It arrives at a moment of collective fatigue with corporate clichés across America and other regions, as resistance to DEI initiatives increase, and many organizations are reducing the very frameworks that earlier assured progress and development. Burey enters that terrain to assert that backing away from authenticity rhetoric – specifically, the corporate language that minimizes personal identity as a grouping of surface traits, quirks and pastimes, forcing workers concerned with managing how they are perceived rather than how they are regarded – is not an effective response; rather, we should redefine it on our individual conditions.

Minority Staff and the Display of Self

Through detailed stories and interviews, Burey illustrates how marginalized workers – employees from diverse backgrounds, LGBTQ+ people, women workers, disabled individuals – learn early on to adjust which persona will “pass”. A vulnerability becomes a disadvantage and people compensate excessively by striving to seem acceptable. The practice of “presenting your true self” becomes a display surface on which all manner of assumptions are cast: affective duties, sharing personal information and constant performance of gratitude. In Burey’s words, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but without the defenses or the confidence to survive what arises.

According to the author, we are asked to expose ourselves – but without the safeguards or the trust to withstand what arises.’

Real-Life Example: Jason’s Experience

Burey demonstrates this dynamic through the narrative of Jason, a employee with hearing loss who decided to teach his co-workers about deaf culture and communication practices. His willingness to discuss his background – an act of candor the office often commends as “genuineness” – temporarily made everyday communications easier. Yet, the author reveals, that progress was precarious. When staff turnover eliminated the casual awareness he had established, the atmosphere of inclusion dissolved with it. “Everything he taught departed with those employees,” he notes wearily. What was left was the fatigue of being forced to restart, of being held accountable for an organization’s educational process. From the author’s perspective, this demonstrates to be requested to expose oneself lacking safeguards: to endanger oneself in a framework that celebrates your openness but fails to codify it into regulation. Genuineness becomes a snare when institutions depend on personal sharing rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Idea of Resistance

Burey’s writing is at once understandable and expressive. She combines intellectual rigor with a style of connection: an invitation for followers to participate, to challenge, to dissent. In Burey’s opinion, professional resistance is not overt defiance but moral resistance – the effort of resisting conformity in environments that demand gratitude for mere inclusion. To dissent, from her perspective, is to interrogate the narratives organizations tell about justice and belonging, and to decline engagement in practices that maintain inequity. It may appear as calling out discrimination in a discussion, opting out of uncompensated “inclusion” work, or defining borders around how much of one’s identity is provided to the organization. Resistance, Burey indicates, is an declaration of personal dignity in spaces that typically encourage conformity. It is a discipline of honesty rather than defiance, a way of asserting that a person’s dignity is not conditional on institutional approval.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses rigid dichotomies. Her work does not simply toss out “sincerity” completely: instead, she calls for its redefinition. For Burey, sincerity is far from the unrestricted expression of character that corporate culture frequently praises, but a more deliberate correspondence between one’s values and personal behaviors – a honesty that rejects distortion by corporate expectations. Rather than treating authenticity as a directive to reveal too much or adjust to cleansed standards of candor, Burey advises readers to keep the elements of it rooted in truth-telling, individual consciousness and ethical clarity. In her view, the aim is not to abandon sincerity but to relocate it – to transfer it from the executive theatrical customs and to interactions and workplaces where confidence, fairness and answerability make {